Drive a stint. ACCELX turns your telemetry into a clear debrief, personalised setup changes, and driver coaching built around how you actually drive.
Install ACCELX on Windows, choose your simulator, and connect in under five minutes. Assetto Corsa and ACC are supported, with LMU available in beta.
ACCELX captures your inputs, tyre state, chassis behaviour, and G-forces while you drive - lap by lap and corner by corner.
After a valid stint, pit and TESSIE prepares the debrief automatically: tyre behaviour, braking, throttle, slip, suspension, ABS, and traction control.
TESSIE turns the debrief into a setup direction in about seven seconds. Supported workflows can write a new setup file while keeping your original baseline unchanged.
Drive, pit, understand the car, and return with a clearer setup.
Install the Windows app, select your simulator, and confirm the game path.
Drive, pit, read the debrief, and ask TESSIE a follow-up.
TESSIE builds setup direction from your telemetry in about seven seconds.
Start from a default, existing, or pro setup. ACCELX edits a new copy and keeps the original untouched.
TESSIE tracks how you brake, rotate, use throttle, and prefer the car to feel.
Automatic stint debriefs explain braking, entry balance, apex behaviour, exit traction, tyres, and driver inputs in plain language.
Compare laps across 45 channels, inspect full traces, and use the reconstructed track map to see exactly where each event happened.
Generate Safe, Balanced, or Attack setup direction from your driving data, with the reasoning for every proposed change.
Turn lap data into coaching for braking references, rotation, throttle application, tyre use, and recurring driving habits.
Understand each telemetry channel inside the app, track recurring patterns, and connect what you change in the setup to what improves on circuit.
Product updates, new simulator support, and notifications when trial access opens.
Get In Touch
Connects directly to your simulator. Reads live telemetry every session. Acts as a fully conversational race engineer -without any manual input required.
Current beta records range from a 0.3-second improvement after an initial debrief to a maximum recorded gain of 1.7 seconds. ACCELX shows the telemetry evidence behind each recommendation.
The quickest gains usually come from finding one high-impact issue in braking, tyre use, traction, or setup balance, then testing one clear change at a time.
Recorded beta observations, not guaranteed outcomes. Results vary by driver, car, track, baseline setup, and practice quality.
Drive, pit, understand the car, and return with a clearer setup.
Install the Windows app, select your simulator, and confirm the game path.
Drive, pit, read the debrief, and ask TESSIE a follow-up.
TESSIE builds setup direction from your telemetry in about seven seconds.
Start from a default, existing, or pro setup. ACCELX edits a new copy and keeps the original untouched.
TESSIE tracks how you brake, rotate, use throttle, and prefer the car to feel.
Simple first. Deeper when you need it. Start with the AI Engineer, then move through Graphs, Track Map, Learn, and the wider Performance and Engineering views.
Shared memory API connection reads all telemetry channels per sample. Every input, tyre state, and chassis behaviour captured continuously with no manual export.
Full stint processed at pit entry. Tyre temperature distribution across all four corners analysed against ideal operating windows for the compound.
AI identifies exactly where performance is being lost -braking reference, apex speed deficit, or a setup imbalance loading tyres incorrectly.
Custom setup built around how you are driving the car. ACCELX can generate the full recommendation in about 7 seconds and present the changes clearly enough to implement in under 10 seconds.
Full session context held. Ask follow-up questions in natural language. Tessie keeps it simple when you are learning, then gives deeper setup reasoning, alternatives, and tyre strategy when you want more detail.
Most sim drivers adjust wing angles by feel. ACCELX reads your aerodynamic channels and tells you exactly what the air is doing to your car and what to change.
ACCELX reads your front and rear downforce values each lap and computes the aero balance as a percentage split. If your setup is generating 58% rear bias, the AI identifies whether that is causing terminal understeer on corner entry or protecting rear-end stability at high speed and recommends the wing adjustment to correct it.
Every wing adjustment is a trade-off between straight-line speed and cornering grip. ACCELX logs your drag coefficient and models the lap time impact of each change against your specific track layout -telling you whether more or less downforce is worth the straight-line cost at this circuit.
Suspension travel and ride height directly affect how your car generates aerodynamic load. ACCELX cross-references your suspension travel data with your downforce channels to detect whether bottoming events are collapsing your aero platform -a common cause of lap-to-lap handling inconsistency that most drivers never identify.
At the grip limit, an aerodynamic stall can cause a sudden and violent loss of rear downforce. ACCELX monitors your lateral G and slip data for the signature of rear aero stall -a rapid loss of lateral grip at high cornering speed without a corresponding increase in tyre slip and alerts you before it becomes a setup decision you are making blind.
ACCELX connects through each simulator's shared memory API. Assetto Corsa and Assetto Corsa Competizione have full integrations, while Le Mans Ultimate is in beta. Titles below are not available yet and are clearly marked In Development.
Every channel is recorded per sample, per lap, and made available to both the AI and the visualisation layer. No other sim racing AI platform captures this depth of data.
Our most deeply integrated title. Built with LMU's telemetry model from day one -Hypercar tyre behaviour, endurance fuel load management, and the Circuit de la Sarthe understood natively.
Reads LMU telemetry directly with no file exports, manual triggers, or third-party bridge.
Analyses Hypercar, LMP2, and GT3 tyre behaviour by car class and stint.
Tracks fuel load lap by lap so setup advice matches the car's current state.
Detects pit entry and prepares the full stint debrief automatically.
The driver beta gives you access to the ACCELX AI Race Engineer, pit-entry debriefs, setup generation, Driver Profiles, telemetry graphs, track map overlay, and conversational follow-ups across unlimited sessions. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis and access is granted within 24 hours.
This product is for professional racing teams only. Individual drivers and sim racers should use the consumer version above.
Used by professional racing teams for simulator-based setup development and driver evaluation. Not an upgrade of the consumer product. A separate system built to a different specification, validated by 30 or more working motorsport engineers, and deployed locally on team hardware. Every session is engineered around your car, your track programme, and your setup objectives.
Built to order. Contact us before purchase. Every team session is scoped, reviewed, and delivered by our engineering team.
The consumer version captures telemetry at standard sim output rates -typically 20 to 50Hz. The team version runs at 200Hz across all 134 channels simultaneously. This is not a marginal improvement. It fundamentally changes what the data can tell you and which events are resolvable from the record.
A 2-minute lap at 200Hz generates 24,000 samples per channel. A 10-lap stint across 134 channels is approximately 32.2 million data points. A 3-second corner transit at 200km/h is resolved across 600 individual samples. Brake events lasting 0.4 seconds contain 80 discrete capture points -the consumer version sees 8 to 20 across that same event.
A consumer debrief fires in under 30 seconds. A team session processing 10 or more laps at 200Hz takes 4 to 8 minutes of compute before the report is ready. This is expected and intentional. The output is a full engineering document, not a chat response. Processing runs while the team debriefs verbally and the driver is stationary in the garage.
The model is deployed locally on the team's own hardware or a private hosted instance. No session data, setup data, or driver data leaves the team's environment. This is a firm requirement for professional programmes where setup data is commercially sensitive. Local deployment also removes API latency from the processing pipeline.
The consumer version captures 45 core channels. The team version expands to 134, adding extended mechanical, aerodynamic, powertrain, and multi-system interaction channels that professional engineers need for detailed setup work. This is structurally different information that enables different engineering conclusions.
The consumer version produces natural language debriefs and conversational setup suggestions. The team version produces numerical engineering documents that a race engineer can act on immediately without interpretation. Every output format was iterated directly with working engineers until it matched what they would write themselves.
Spring rates in N/mm. ARB stiffness in Nm/deg. Damper curves with slow and fast bump and rebound clicks specified separately. Aero rake in millimetres. Front and rear ride height targets. Tyre pressure cold-start targets per compound. Not "try softening the rear ARB" -exact parameter values with direction and magnitude for every change.
Minimum speed values per corner with standard deviation across the lap set. Outlier laps flagged with identified cause from correlated channel data. For example: T5 minimum speed 97.4 plus or minus 1.8 km/h across 10 laps, with lap 6 flagged as an outlier due to ABS activation at 180 metres. Every corner, every lap, every metric.
Is the driver converging on the limit or plateauing? Is each setup change producing the expected telemetry response? Are gains compounding or diminishing? The system tracks performance direction across every stint and flags when a setup change is not producing the expected response -meaning the hypothesis was wrong and the direction needs to change.
Increasing rear wing by 2 degrees gains 0.3 seconds in Sector 2 but costs 0.2 seconds on the straight. The matrix shows the net lap time impact so the engineer makes the call with data, not instinct. Differential, suspension, aero, and tyre compound trade-offs are all modelled and presented as structured decision tables not prose explanations.
The driver coaching report is generated alongside the setup report but delivered separately so the engineer and driver each work from their own document. It identifies the 3 highest-priority driver technique issues with specific corner references, lap numbers, and the channel evidence for each finding not a setup issue, a driver input issue with data attached.
Load up to four drivers across any channel simultaneously. Overlay throttle traces, brake points, steering angle, and tyre temperatures for the same corner on the same lap. Identify which driver is accessing more of the car, where the lap time delta is built, and whether the gap is a technique issue or a setup preference divergence in a multi-driver programme.
Teams can manually upload clean lap data to feed directly into the local model instance. Minimum 10 laps, same car, same track, consistent conditions. Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset -effectively learning how that specific chassis behaves at its limit and calibrating every subsequent recommendation against actual history, not generic physics assumptions.
Uploaded data calibrates the local model to that car's specific behaviour. Tyre thermal model, powertrain characteristics, and aero sensitivity are learned from your own clean laps rather than generic sim physics assumptions. Corner-specific tyre window targets and optimal pressure build curves are updated per batch.
Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset. Setup recommendations in session 8 are informed by sessions 1 through 7 not just the current stint. The model learns the car's known balance tendencies, develops track-specific operating windows, and identifies recurring setup patterns across similar venues.
Minimum 10 laps per batch. Same car, same track, consistent conditions. Our engineering team reviews each upload before it is applied to verify data quality and flag anomalies before they affect your calibration baseline. All four major formats supported natively.
The analysis pipeline, setup recommendation logic, and channel weightings have been reviewed and signed off by 30 or more professional motorsport engineers using real championship weekend data. Known divergences between sim physics and real-world behaviour are flagged in output. Circuit-specific weighting adjusts per venue automatically.
Recommendation weightings calibrated against actual race weekend data, not simulation assumptions. Where sim physics diverges from real-world behaviour, those known points are flagged -the model does not treat the sim as the ground truth.
Channel importance hierarchies are circuit-specific. What matters at Bathurst is weighted differently to Spa or Le Mans. The model adjusts corner priority, tyre window targets, and aero sensitivity per venue not a single global weighting applied everywhere.
The debrief format was iterated directly with working engineers until the output matched what they would produce themselves. Format, numerical precision, channel prioritisation, and language were all reviewed and approved before deployment to any team.
The team dashboard is not a data viewer. It is a structured decision-making environment built around how professional engineers actually work through session data -from pit-entry overview through to corner-level mechanical balance diagnosis and endurance strategy modelling. Every panel is purpose-built for actionable engineering decisions, not passive review.
Stint-by-stint lap time progression, tyre thermal history, setup change log, and fuel consumption curve. Designed to be readable at a glance from across a pit garage. Automated anomaly flags for tyre spikes, lock events, and aero instability trigger immediately on detection -no manual review required to find problems.
Per-corner tyre temperature across inner, middle, and outer zones. Stint-length degradation curves. Operating window compliance percentage. Ideal temperature target bands overlaid from compound data. Pressure evolution mapped against track and ambient temperature throughout the full stint.
Every setup change logged against subsequent lap time data. The correlation engine computes which parameter changes delivered measurable improvements and which were neutral or detrimental -building a team-specific setup learning database that compounds in value across sessions and race weekends throughout the season.
Reads suspension travel, tyre slip, G-force, and steering angle simultaneously to diagnose the car's mechanical balance at each circuit section. Outputs a corner-by-corner balance report identifying understeer entry events, trailing throttle oversteer signatures, and aero-mechanical interaction zones that mix mechanical and aero causes.
Built specifically for endurance programmes. Models tyre degradation rate against lap time delta to compute the optimal pit window. Fuel load correction applied to each model iteration. Driver changeover windows with tyre temperature warm-up predictions for each stint opening based on that specific car and compound.
Because the team version runs a full motorsport-grade AI model locally on your hardware, minimum specifications are significantly higher than the consumer version. These are hard minimums. Exceeding them improves processing throughput on large multi-driver sessions.
Every team session is scoped individually. Contact our engineering team to discuss your car, your track programme, and your session requirements before purchase.
Paid plans start at $22 USD. Every package includes the TESSIE AI Race Engineer, with higher plans adding focused workspaces for coaching, setup development, map engineering, and 3D replay.
Driver is the 2D track-analysis package. Performance adds driver reports and coaching. Setup adds the Interactive Setup Bay. Engineering unlocks Map Engineering, 3D Coaching, and 3D replay. Every paid package supports secure monthly or annual Stripe checkout.
The Team Session is a completely different product built for professional racing teams using simulator data for real-world setup development. It is not an upgrade of the consumer version. Individual drivers and sim racers do not need this and would not benefit from it.
Team sessions are built to order and delivered following engineering review. Contact us to discuss your programme.
A professional motorsport engineering tool used by racing teams for simulator-based setup development and driver evaluation. Not an upgrade of the consumer product. A separate system built to a different specification, validated by working engineers, and deployed on your own hardware.
The consumer version captures telemetry at standard sim output rates. The team version runs at 200Hz across all 134 channels simultaneously. This is not a marginal improvement. It changes what the data can tell you.
A 2-minute lap at 200Hz generates 24,000 samples per channel. A 10-lap stint across 134 channels is approximately 32.2 million data points. A 3-second corner transit at 200km/h is resolved across 600 individual samples. Brake events lasting 0.4 seconds contain 80 discrete capture points. Micro-events such as ABS pulse cycles, tyre slip spikes and suspension oscillation are fully resolved rather than averaged between samples.
A consumer debrief fires in 15 to 30 seconds at pit entry. A team session processing 10 or more laps at 200Hz takes 4 to 8 minutes of compute before the report is ready. This is expected and intentional. The output is a full engineering document, not a chat response. The processing window is used while the team reviews the previous stint and the driver is stationary.
At 200Hz the system captures detail that lower sample rates structurally cannot. Transient events at corner entry, differential lock-up signatures, suspension harmonic oscillation through kerbs and rapid tyre pressure build on the out-lap are all resolved at the sample level. The consumer version operating at 20 to 50Hz sees 8 to 20 samples across the same brake event the team version resolves to 80.
The model does not run on shared cloud infrastructure. It is deployed locally to the team's own hardware or a private hosted instance. No session data, setup data or driver data leaves the team's environment. This is a firm requirement for professional programmes where setup data is commercially sensitive. The local deployment also removes API latency from the processing pipeline, which is part of why the 200Hz throughput is achievable.
The consumer model is trained on sim-racing patterns and AI-inferred engineering logic. The team model analysis pipeline has been reviewed and signed off by 30 or more professional motorsport engineers with real-world championship data behind them.
Setup recommendation weightings calibrated against actual race weekend data, not simulation assumptions. Known divergence points between sim physics and real-world behaviour are flagged in output.
Channel importance hierarchies are circuit-specific. What matters at Bathurst is weighted differently to Spa or Le Mans. The model adjusts corner priority, tyre window targets and aero sensitivity per venue.
The debrief format was iterated with working engineers until the output matched what they would produce themselves. Engineers reviewed the written structure, numerical precision and channel prioritisation order.
The consumer version produces natural language debriefs and conversational setup suggestions. The team version produces numerical engineering documents that a race engineer can act on immediately.
Spring rates in N/mm. ARB stiffness in Nm/deg. Damper curves with slow and fast bump and rebound clicks. Aero rake in millimetres. Front and rear ride height targets. Tyre pressure cold-start targets per compound. Not "try softening the rear ARB." Exact parameter values with direction and magnitude.
Minimum speed values per corner with standard deviation across the session lap set. Outlier laps flagged with cause identified. For example: T5 minimum speed 97.4 plus or minus 1.8 km/h across 10 laps, with lap 6 identified as an outlier due to ABS activation event at 180 metres.
Is the driver converging on the limit or plateauing? Is each setup change producing the expected response? Are gains compounding or diminishing? The system tracks session-over-session performance direction and flags when a setup change is not producing the expected response across the telemetry.
Adding rear wing by 2 degrees gains time in Sector 2 but costs on the straight. The matrix shows the net lap time impact so the engineer decides with data not instinct. Differential, suspension, aero and tyre compound trade-offs are all modelled and presented as structured tables, not prose.
Teams can manually upload clean lap data to feed directly into the local model instance. Minimum 10 laps, same car, same track, consistent conditions. Each batch improves the model's baseline for that specific vehicle.
Uploaded data calibrates the local model instance to that car's specific behaviour. Tyre thermal model, powertrain characteristics and aero sensitivity are learned from your own clean laps rather than generic sim physics assumptions.
Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset. Setup recommendations in session 8 are informed by sessions 1 through 7 not just the current stint. The model learns the car's known balance tendencies.
CSV telemetry export. MoTeC i2 export. Bosch DDU export. Raw ACCELX session files. Uploaded data is isolated to the team's private instance and is never used in the consumer model or shared with any other team.
Because the team version runs a full motorsport-grade AI model locally on your hardware, minimum specifications are significantly higher than for the consumer version. These are hard minimums. Meeting them exactly will work. Exceeding them will improve processing throughput on large sessions.
The team dashboard is not a data viewer. It is a decision-making environment built around how professional engineers actually work through session data. Every panel is purpose-built for actionable engineering decisions, not passive review.
Top-level session summary showing stint-by-stint lap time progression, tyre thermal history, setup change log, and fuel consumption curve. Designed to be readable at a glance from across a pit garage.
Load up to four drivers simultaneously across any channel. Overlay throttle traces, brake points, steering angle, and tyre temperatures for the same corner on the same lap. Identify which driver is accessing more of the car and where.
Per-corner tyre temperature across inner, middle, and outer zones. Stint-length degradation curves. Operating window compliance percentage. Ideal temperature target bands overlaid from the vehicle's compound data. Pressure evolution mapped against track temperature.
Every setup change entered into the system is logged against subsequent lap time data. The correlation engine computes which parameter changes delivered measurable improvements and which were neutral or detrimental -building a team-specific setup learning database across sessions.
Reads suspension travel, tyre slip, G-force, and steering angle simultaneously to diagnose the car's mechanical balance at each circuit section. Outputs a corner-by-corner balance report identifying understeer entry events, trailing throttle oversteer signatures, and aero-mechanical interaction zones.
Built specifically for endurance programmes. Models tyre deg rate against lap time delta to compute the optimal pit window. Fuel load correction applied to each model iteration. Driver changeover windows with tyre temp warm-up predictions for each stint opening.
The consumer version captures 45 core channels -inputs, tyre state, dynamics, and environment. The team version expands to 134 channels, adding the extended mechanical, aerodynamic, vehicle dynamics, and multi-system interaction channels that professional engineers need for detailed setup work.
What professional engineers, club-level drivers, and track day enthusiasts say about the ACCELX platform.
"We ran it alongside our MoTeC system for three sessions to validate the outputs. It agreed with us on everything that mattered and flagged a rear brake bias issue we'd been attributing to driver error. It wasn't."
"The debrief format is exactly what I'd produce myself for a driver review. I've reviewed a lot of AI outputs that need translating for the garage. This one does not. It is already in the right language."
"For track days it is genuinely transformative. I'm not a professional but I understand what is happening to my car after every session now. Before this I was just guessing."
"Club-level endurance racer. The tyre deg analysis is the one thing I never had access to before. Understanding when to push and when to protect the tyres has completely changed how I manage a stint."
"The 200Hz data resolution resolved a transient that showed up as a brief instability at the apex of T7. At standard sample rates it would have been invisible. Found and fixed in one session."
"I use real MoTeC data from my actual car and this is what I compare the AI's output against. It is not quite at that level -nothing is -but it is the closest I've seen from an AI system and for sim work it is more than enough."
"Track day instructor. I use it with my students to show them what they're actually doing. The track map coloured by brake pressure is the clearest teaching tool I've found. Visual. Immediate. Correct."
"Our team engineer validated the setup recommendation logic against three race weekends of real data. The correlation was strong. We're now using it as a pre-session planning tool before we even fire the car."
"We ran it alongside our MoTeC system for three sessions to validate the outputs. It agreed with us on everything that mattered and flagged a rear brake bias issue we'd been attributing to driver error. It wasn't."
"The debrief format is exactly what I'd produce myself for a driver review. I've reviewed a lot of AI outputs that need translating for the garage. This one does not. It is already in the right language."
"For track days it is genuinely transformative. I'm not a professional but I understand what is happening to my car after every session now. Before this I was just guessing."
"Club-level endurance racer. The tyre deg analysis is the one thing I never had access to before. Understanding when to push and when to protect the tyres has completely changed how I manage a stint."
"The 200Hz data resolution resolved a transient that showed up as a brief instability at the apex of T7. At standard sample rates it would have been invisible. Found and fixed in one session."
"I use real MoTeC data from my actual car and this is what I compare the AI's output against. It is not quite at that level -nothing is -but it is the closest I've seen from an AI system and for sim work it is more than enough."
"I came in sceptical. The output on my first session was a four-page engineering debrief that would have taken me an hour to produce manually. It took the AI about 6 minutes. I'm not sceptical anymore."
"Track day community does not usually have access to this level of analysis. The fact that it fires automatically at pit entry means you actually use it. No faff. No exports. Just drive, pit, read."
"The multi-driver comparison found 0.4 seconds of lap time in the data that nobody could explain. It was corner exit traction -one driver feathering the throttle, one applying it progressively. Night and day trace difference."
"For club-level racing this is genuinely beyond what I thought was available. My engineer in real life does similar work but I cannot afford him for sim sessions. Now I do not need to."
"The setup correlation tool is the most useful thing in the team dashboard. We've been running for three months and it is built a database of what works at each track. That is a product you cannot buy elsewhere."
"I do weekend track days and this changed what I'm able to learn per session. Instead of vague impressions I have corner-level data telling me exactly what changed between run 1 and run 4."
"We validated the aero analysis against CFD outputs from our actual car programme. The relative ordering of setup changes matched. For simulator work the delta accuracy is excellent."
"The tyre stint modelling for endurance predicted our tyre cliff within 2 laps over a 28-lap stint. We changed our pit strategy based on it. It was correct. We gained track position."
"I came in sceptical. The output on my first session was a four-page engineering debrief that would have taken me an hour to produce manually. It took the AI about 6 minutes. I'm not sceptical anymore."
"Track day community does not usually have access to this level of analysis. The fact that it fires automatically at pit entry means you actually use it. No faff. No exports. Just drive, pit, read."
"The multi-driver comparison found 0.4 seconds of lap time in the data that nobody could explain. It was corner exit traction -one driver feathering the throttle, one applying it progressively. Night and day trace difference."
"For club-level racing this is genuinely beyond what I thought was available. My engineer in real life does similar work but I cannot afford him for sim sessions. Now I do not need to."
We do the team version on order. Each session is engineered to your car, your track and your programme. Contact us to start the conversation.
All team session applications go through an engineering review before access is granted. This is not a bureaucratic process -it exists so that every team session we deliver is scoped correctly and the output is actually useful for your programme. Read this before applying.
Contact us with your car, track programme, and session objectives. We need to understand what you are trying to achieve before we scope the session correctly. Applications are reviewed in the order received on a rolling basis.
Applications take up to 7 days to process. Our engineering team reviews every application against the current session schedule and available deployment capacity. We may reach out during this period with clarifying questions about your programme.
If your application is approved we will reach out with an invoice and next steps for your session. For paid applications, access is guaranteed to be granted within 24 hours of payment confirmation. For standard applications, access timing is confirmed at this stage.
Before your session begins, our engineering team conducts a technical onboarding to configure the local deployment, verify your hardware meets specification, and align on session objectives and output format. This is typically a 30-minute process.
To process your application efficiently, include the following information in your initial contact. Incomplete applications take longer to review and may require a follow-up before we can proceed.
Once your application is submitted, here is what to expect from us. We aim to respond to all applications within 7 days. If you have not heard back within 10 business days, please follow up directly.
All team sessions are covered by a mutual non-disclosure agreement. We take setup data and programme data seriously. The NDA is a standard engineering programme agreement -it is simple, mutual, and is signed before any session data or programme details are shared in either direction. We do not use complex legal language or impose unusual terms. It is a straightforward confidentiality agreement.
The NDA is mutual -it applies to both parties. We do not share your session data, setup data, driver performance data, or programme details with any third party. You do not share our proprietary engineering methodology, model architecture, or output formats publicly. These are the two core obligations.
The NDA is sent as part of the onboarding package once your application is approved. It is a one-page document in plain language. We do not use it as a barrier -we use it as a commitment to both parties that the programme is treated professionally. Signing is typically completed within 24 hours of receipt.
All team session participants are required to provide structured feedback every two weeks during an active programme. This is not optional -it is a condition of access. The team version is in active development and the engineering quality of the output directly depends on real programme feedback from teams using the system under actual session conditions.
The team version is not a finished commercial product. It is an active engineering development programme. The output quality compounds over time as the team's local model is calibrated and as the team's feedback informs engineering decisions on the core pipeline. Teams that provide consistent, detailed feedback get a better-calibrated product over time. Teams that do not provide feedback may have their access reviewed.
For paid applications, once your invoice is settled, access is guaranteed to be granted within 24 hours of payment confirmation. We commit to this as a firm service timeline. If access is not granted within 24 hours of payment, contact us immediately and we will resolve it. Standard (unpaid) applications have access timing confirmed at the approval stage -this varies based on session scheduling and current deployment capacity.
Team sessions are priced at $1,000 per session, built to order. This is not the normal ACCELX price for individual sim racers. The normal consumer ACCELX AI Race Engineer is expected to release at around $22 USD per month. The $1,000 price applies only to the professional Team Sim Session, covering local deployment, engineering review, onboarding, output delivery, and post-session calibration. There is no subscription model for the team product. Each session is a discrete engineering engagement. Ongoing multi-session programmes are available and are scoped separately with our engineering team.
Australia's leading simulator consultancy - from budget-conscious first builds to professional race driver programmes. We match every driver to the right hardware, every time.

A budget-matched shopping list with a detailed spreadsheet, local pricing, a full cost breakdown, and links to the lowest available prices.

Tier 1 plus a focused 15-60 minute voice or video call to compare gear options, simulator designs, and the reasoning behind the chosen build.

Tier 2 plus a full build plan with multiple simulator options, room layout, rig layout, cable planning, and personal field-of-view calculations.

Simulator matched to a real race car profile - wheel design, pedal travel, seat position, custom gear exploration, and software setup support.
60+ drivers and teams have worked with our consultancy. Here's what they had to say.
"The build list was incredibly detailed -every part cross-referenced against Australian suppliers with links and pricing. Saved me weeks of research and probably a few hundred dollars."
"Honestly did not expect this level of detail for $40. The spreadsheet broke down every component, gave me alternatives at different price points, and explained the trade-offs. Proper engineering work."
"Good turnaround and solid advice on the sim profile matching my GT3 car. A couple of things I'd have done slightly differently but the pedal travel and wheel weight recommendations were spot on."
"The video call in Tier 2 was worth every cent. We went through three rig options and I actually understood why one was better suited to my room and driving style. Great consult."
"Had the Tier 3 build plan done -the room layout diagram alone was something I hadn't even thought about. Cable routing, monitor positioning, FOV numbers. Comprehensive is an understatement."
"Fast. Thorough. Matching seat position to my real car was a level of detail I didn't expect from an online consult. The Pro Driver Program is worth it if you are serious about your training."
"Really useful getting an outside perspective on the hardware. I was convinced I needed a motion platform -the consult helped me realise the money was better spent on load cell pedals first."
"Went from completely lost to confident in a few days. The Tier 1 list was better than anything I'd found on forums after two weeks of searching. Clear communication throughout."
"Got the Tier 2 done before committing to a 3k rig. The call changed about 40% of what I was going to buy. Saved more than ten times the consult fee on parts I'd have returned."
"Didn't realise how much the FOV calculation would change my driving feel until I set it up correctly. That one change was a revelation. Tier 3 completely justified."
"Solid advice, well structured document. Asked for a slight revision on the monitor setup and it was turned around the same day. Responsive and professional throughout."
"Been racing for years and still got useful recommendations. The Pro program matched my Tasman FJ specifics to load cell calibration in a way I hadn't seen done before."
"The build list was incredibly detailed -every part cross-referenced against Australian suppliers with links and pricing. Saved me weeks of research and probably a few hundred dollars."
"Honestly did not expect this level of detail for $40. The spreadsheet broke down every component, gave me alternatives at different price points, and explained the trade-offs. Proper engineering work."
"Good turnaround and solid advice on the sim profile matching my GT3 car. A couple of things I'd have done slightly differently but the pedal travel and wheel weight recommendations were spot on."
"The video call in Tier 2 was worth every cent. We went through three rig options and I actually understood why one was better suited to my room and driving style. Great consult."
"Had the Tier 3 build plan done -the room layout diagram alone was something I hadn't even thought about. Cable routing, monitor positioning, FOV numbers. Comprehensive is an understatement."
"Fast. Thorough. Matching seat position to my real car was a level of detail I didn't expect from an online consult. The Pro Driver Program is worth it if you are serious about your training."
"Really useful getting an outside perspective on the hardware. I was convinced I needed a motion platform -the consult helped me realise the money was better spent on load cell pedals first."
"Went from completely lost to confident in a few days. The Tier 1 list was better than anything I'd found on forums after two weeks of searching. Clear communication throughout."
"Got the Tier 2 done before committing to a 3k rig. The call changed about 40% of what I was going to buy. Saved more than ten times the consult fee on parts I'd have returned."
"Didn't realise how much the FOV calculation would change my driving feel until I set it up correctly. That one change was a revelation. Tier 3 completely justified."
"Solid advice, well structured document. Asked for a slight revision on the monitor setup and it was turned around the same day. Responsive and professional throughout."
"Been racing for years and still got useful recommendations. The Pro program matched my Tasman FJ specifics to load cell calibration in a way I hadn't seen done before."
"Honestly surprised at how personalised it felt for a remote consult. Mentioned the size of my space and the gear was perfectly sized for it. Nothing over-specified, nothing missing."
"The Tier 2 call was a proper technical conversation, not a sales pitch. We went through load cell vs potentiometer pedals in real depth. Came away genuinely informed."
"Good value and useful detail. The pricing was accurate for Australia which is harder to find than you'd think. Would have liked slightly more on the software side but hardware coverage was thorough."
"Used ACCELX consultancy before building my second rig. First one was built on forum advice and was a mess. This time everything was right first go. Night and day."
"I asked a lot of questions and every single one got a detailed answer. Feels like you are talking to someone who actually uses this gear, not just selling it."
"Came in with a very specific brief -single screen, minimal footprint, GT-feel pedals and got exactly that back, costed out with part numbers. Fast and useful."
"I needed something that would genuinely prepare me for my Ginetta. The Pro program built a complete profile -I could feel the difference in braking feel almost immediately."
"Not just a list of hardware -the reasoning behind each choice was explained clearly. I knew exactly why each part was recommended and what it would change about my sim feel."
"Honestly surprised at how personalised it felt for a remote consult. Mentioned the size of my space and the gear was perfectly sized for it. Nothing over-specified, nothing missing."
"The Tier 2 call was a proper technical conversation, not a sales pitch. We went through load cell vs potentiometer pedals in real depth. Came away genuinely informed."
"Good value and useful detail. The pricing was accurate for Australia which is harder to find than you'd think. Would have liked slightly more on the software side but hardware coverage was thorough."
"Used ACCELX consultancy before building my second rig. First one was built on forum advice and was a mess. This time everything was right first go. Night and day."
"I asked a lot of questions and every single one got a detailed answer. Feels like you are talking to someone who actually uses this gear, not just selling it."
"Came in with a very specific brief -single screen, minimal footprint, GT-feel pedals and got exactly that back, costed out with part numbers. Fast and useful."
"I needed something that would genuinely prepare me for my Ginetta. The Pro program built a complete profile -I could feel the difference in braking feel almost immediately."
"Not just a list of hardware -the reasoning behind each choice was explained clearly. I knew exactly why each part was recommended and what it would change about my sim feel."
A clean, budget-led parts selection for drivers who want to build with confidence. We turn your budget into a realistic shopping list, then give you the pricing, links, and cost breakdown to move quickly.

Tier 2 adds a direct strategy call to your shopping list. We compare realistic gear options, talk through simulator designs, and explain why each recommendation fits your budget, driving goals, and space.

Tier 3 moves from buying advice into build planning. You receive multiple simulator options, a layout for your room and rig, cable planning, and screen/FOV guidance so the final setup feels intentional.

A deeper simulator programme for drivers who want their sim to mirror a chosen car as closely as practical. We work through cockpit position, control feel, custom gear options, and software matching with an allocated engineer.

For general enquiries, team session bookings, trial and plan questions, or partnership discussions -we respond within 24 hours.
We will get back to you within 24 hours.
The 3-day trial includes TESSIE Engineer, Live, and Learn with 20 AI messages across the trial. No payment is required. The three-day window starts when your account is activated.
Thanks. We will email you when a suitable testing place is available.
TESSIE Driver includes Engineer, Live, Graphs, Progress, Learn, AI setup guidance, and 50 AI messages. It is the focused 2D workflow without 3D replay tools.
$22 USD per month for one user on one active Windows device. The subscription renews monthly until cancelled. The 3-day trial includes the core workspace, 20 AI messages, and no payment requirement.