Australia's leading sim racing platform -AI-driven race engineering and expert hardware consultancy for drivers who demand every tenth.
The moment you open your simulator, ACCELX connects through the shared memory API and begins recording telemetry. No file exports, no manual setup, no plugins. Most drivers complete the one-time setup in less than 5 minutes.
Every sample is captured continuously -inputs, tyre state, chassis behaviour, G-forces -across your entire session, lap by lap, corner by corner.
The AI triggers automatically. Full stint analysis: tyre temps, throttle and brake patterns, slip events, suspension movement, ABS and TC activation. No button press.
ACCELX can generate a full setup recommendation in about 7 seconds from your actual data, then present the changes clearly enough to implement in under 10 seconds.
ACCELX is designed for drivers across the whole spectrum: first-time setup users, league racers, sim centre coaches, and serious endurance drivers. It starts simple, then grows with you as your driving and engineering understanding develops.
Most drivers can install ACCELX, connect the simulator, and start collecting telemetry with a one-time setup that takes less than 5 minutes. No file exports, no plugin hunting, and no engineering background required.
Once connected, normal use is quick: drive, pit, read the debrief, ask Tessie a question, and get back on track without turning practice into homework.
ACCELX can auto-generate a full setup recommendation in about 7 seconds from your driving data, with clear reasoning for the changes instead of a mystery preset.
The recommended setup changes are presented clearly so they can be applied in under 10 seconds. You spend time testing the car, not decoding engineering notes.
Tessie builds a personal Driver Profile around how you brake, rotate the car, use throttle, manage tyres, and prefer the setup to feel. Over time it learns your habits, recognises recurring mistakes, predicts likely setup needs, and gives more personal recommendations as you improve.
ACCELX detects pit entry and fires a complete analysis of your stint, corner-by-corner, automatically. Per-corner breakdown of braking points, entry behaviour, apex load, and exit traction -identifying which corners are costing the most time.
Setup recommendations are built specifically around how you are driving the car, not from a template. ACCELX can generate a full setup in about 7 seconds and explain the exact change in plain language.
Dedicated graphs tab with full per-lap telemetry traces for every channel, overlaid across laps, with a reconstructed track map coloured by throttle and brake input showing exactly where on circuit each event occurred.
After the debrief, ask Tessie follow-up questions in normal language. It is designed to feel easy for beginners, while still giving advanced drivers setup reasoning, alternatives, tyre strategy, and engineering trade-offs.
Every channel explained in depth directly inside the app. Click any channel -Throttle, Brake, Slip Analysis, Traction Loss, Suspension Travel and get a full lesson covering what the graph shows, how to read ideal vs. problem traces, parameter ranges, and tuning strategies. No external reading required.
ACCELX updates, beta access notifications, and exclusive early access for subscribers only.
Get In Touch
Connects directly to your simulator. Reads live telemetry every session. Acts as a fully conversational race engineer -without any manual input required.
Our beta drivers have seen consistent lap time improvements across every car and track combination. ACCELX doesn't guess -it reads exactly what your car is doing and tells you precisely what to change.
The average driver gains 0.6–0.9 seconds within the first two sessions. The fastest improvements come from identifying and correcting a single key issue the AI finds in your tyre temperature data or braking traces.
ACCELX is designed for drivers across the whole spectrum: first-time setup users, league racers, sim centre coaches, and serious endurance drivers. It starts simple, then grows with you as your driving and engineering understanding develops.
Most drivers can install ACCELX, connect the simulator, and start collecting telemetry with a one-time setup that takes less than 5 minutes. No file exports, no plugin hunting, and no engineering background required.
Once connected, normal use is quick: drive, pit, read the debrief, ask Tessie a question, and get back on track without turning practice into homework.
ACCELX can auto-generate a full setup recommendation in about 7 seconds from your driving data, with clear reasoning for the changes instead of a mystery preset.
The recommended setup changes are presented clearly so they can be applied in under 10 seconds. You spend time testing the car, not decoding engineering notes.
Tessie builds a personal Driver Profile around how you brake, rotate the car, use throttle, manage tyres, and prefer the setup to feel. Over time it learns your habits, recognises recurring mistakes, predicts likely setup needs, and gives more personal recommendations as you improve.
Four tabs. Full picture. Tessie is designed to look and feel simple from the first session, then reveal deeper telemetry, setup reasoning, Driver Profiles and learning tools as you improve.
Shared memory API connection reads all telemetry channels per sample. Every input, tyre state, and chassis behaviour captured continuously with no manual export.
Full stint processed at pit entry. Tyre temperature distribution across all four corners analysed against ideal operating windows for the compound.
AI identifies exactly where performance is being lost -braking reference, apex speed deficit, or a setup imbalance loading tyres incorrectly.
Custom setup built around how you are driving the car. ACCELX can generate the full recommendation in about 7 seconds and present the changes clearly enough to implement in under 10 seconds.
Full session context held. Ask follow-up questions in natural language. Tessie keeps it simple when you are learning, then gives deeper setup reasoning, alternatives, and tyre strategy when you want more detail.
Most sim drivers adjust wing angles by feel. ACCELX reads your aerodynamic channels and tells you exactly what the air is doing to your car and what to change.
ACCELX reads your front and rear downforce values each lap and computes the aero balance as a percentage split. If your setup is generating 58% rear bias, the AI identifies whether that's causing terminal understeer on corner entry or protecting rear-end stability at high speed and recommends the wing adjustment to correct it.
Every wing adjustment is a trade-off between straight-line speed and cornering grip. ACCELX logs your drag coefficient and models the lap time impact of each change against your specific track layout -telling you whether more or less downforce is worth the straight-line cost at this circuit.
Suspension travel and ride height directly affect how your car generates aerodynamic load. ACCELX cross-references your suspension travel data with your downforce channels to detect whether bottoming events are collapsing your aero platform -a common cause of lap-to-lap handling inconsistency that most drivers never identify.
At the grip limit, an aerodynamic stall can cause a sudden and violent loss of rear downforce. ACCELX monitors your lateral G and slip data for the signature of rear aero stall -a rapid loss of lateral grip at high cornering speed without a corresponding increase in tyre slip and alerts you before it becomes a setup decision you're making blind.
ACCELX connects to your simulator via the shared memory API -no manual export, no additional software. The integration depth varies by title. Full integrations are live today. Ongoing development titles are in active build and will be available during the beta period.
Early Access integration in active development. Shared memory API structure mapped. Integration expected during beta period.
Point-to-point telemetry model under development. Stage-split analysis and surface-specific tyre work in progress.
R3E data API integration under active build. DTM and WTCR car model calibration in progress for initial release.
Data analysis integration -telemetry import and post-session debrief pipeline. Live shared memory integration roadmapped for a later stage.
If your primary sim isn't listed, contact us. Simulator support is prioritised by active user demand during the beta period.
Every channel is recorded per sample, per lap, and made available to both the AI and the visualisation layer. No other sim racing AI platform captures this depth of data.
Our most deeply integrated title. Built with LMU's telemetry model from day one -Hypercar tyre behaviour, endurance fuel load management, and the Circuit de la Sarthe understood natively.
ACCELX connects directly to LMU's shared memory API the moment you open the sim. Every telemetry channel -tyre temperatures, brake temps, suspension travel, fuel load, lateral G -is captured continuously per sample, per lap. No file export. No manual trigger. No third-party bridge. It reads the data the same way LMU's own systems do.
The Hypercar compounds in LMU degrade differently across Le Mans' three sectors. ACCELX understands the Mulsanne straight thermal load versus the technical Porsche Curves sector and debriefs tyre behaviour in that context not a generic GT3-style analysis applied to the wrong car class. The compound behaviour, operating windows and degradation patterns are built into the model from day one.
In LMU endurance races, fuel weight shifts brake bias, tyre operating window and car balance across the stint. ACCELX tracks the fuel load channel continuously and adjusts its analysis lap by lap -so the setup recommendations it gives at lap 20 reflect the actual car state at lap 20, not the state at the start. Tyre deg curves are modelled across the full stint, not just peak temperatures.
ACCELX detects pit entry automatically through the shared memory API and fires a full stint debrief without any input from the driver. By the time the stop is complete the analysis is ready. No button press. No setup. No file to export. In LMU endurance racing the pit stop is the only natural break -ACCELX uses it automatically, every time.
The driver beta gives you access to the ACCELX AI Race Engineer, pit-entry debriefs, setup generation, Driver Profiles, telemetry graphs, track map overlay, and conversational follow-ups across unlimited sessions. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis and access is granted within 24 hours.
This product is for professional racing teams only. Individual drivers and sim racers should use the consumer version above.
Used by professional racing teams for simulator-based setup development and driver evaluation. Not an upgrade of the consumer product. A separate system built to a different specification, validated by 30 or more working motorsport engineers, and deployed locally on team hardware. Every session is engineered around your car, your track programme, and your setup objectives.
Built to order. Contact us before purchase. Every team session is scoped, reviewed, and delivered by our engineering team.
The consumer version captures telemetry at standard sim output rates -typically 20 to 50Hz. The team version runs at 200Hz across all 134 channels simultaneously. This is not a marginal improvement. It fundamentally changes what the data can tell you and which events are resolvable from the record.
A 2-minute lap at 200Hz generates 24,000 samples per channel. A 10-lap stint across 134 channels is approximately 32.2 million data points. A 3-second corner transit at 200km/h is resolved across 600 individual samples. Brake events lasting 0.4 seconds contain 80 discrete capture points -the consumer version sees 8 to 20 across that same event.
A consumer debrief fires in under 30 seconds. A team session processing 10 or more laps at 200Hz takes 4 to 8 minutes of compute before the report is ready. This is expected and intentional. The output is a full engineering document, not a chat response. Processing runs while the team debriefs verbally and the driver is stationary in the garage.
The model is deployed locally on the team's own hardware or a private hosted instance. No session data, setup data, or driver data leaves the team's environment. This is a firm requirement for professional programmes where setup data is commercially sensitive. Local deployment also removes API latency from the processing pipeline.
The consumer version captures 45 core channels. The team version expands to 134, adding extended mechanical, aerodynamic, powertrain, and multi-system interaction channels that professional engineers need for detailed setup work. This is structurally different information that enables different engineering conclusions.
The consumer version produces natural language debriefs and conversational setup suggestions. The team version produces numerical engineering documents that a race engineer can act on immediately without interpretation. Every output format was iterated directly with working engineers until it matched what they would write themselves.
Spring rates in N/mm. ARB stiffness in Nm/deg. Damper curves with slow and fast bump and rebound clicks specified separately. Aero rake in millimetres. Front and rear ride height targets. Tyre pressure cold-start targets per compound. Not "try softening the rear ARB" -exact parameter values with direction and magnitude for every change.
Minimum speed values per corner with standard deviation across the lap set. Outlier laps flagged with identified cause from correlated channel data. For example: T5 minimum speed 97.4 plus or minus 1.8 km/h across 10 laps, with lap 6 flagged as an outlier due to ABS activation at 180 metres. Every corner, every lap, every metric.
Is the driver converging on the limit or plateauing? Is each setup change producing the expected telemetry response? Are gains compounding or diminishing? The system tracks performance direction across every stint and flags when a setup change is not producing the expected response -meaning the hypothesis was wrong and the direction needs to change.
Increasing rear wing by 2 degrees gains 0.3 seconds in Sector 2 but costs 0.2 seconds on the straight. The matrix shows the net lap time impact so the engineer makes the call with data, not instinct. Differential, suspension, aero, and tyre compound trade-offs are all modelled and presented as structured decision tables not prose explanations.
The driver coaching report is generated alongside the setup report but delivered separately so the engineer and driver each work from their own document. It identifies the 3 highest-priority driver technique issues with specific corner references, lap numbers, and the channel evidence for each finding not a setup issue, a driver input issue with data attached.
Load up to four drivers across any channel simultaneously. Overlay throttle traces, brake points, steering angle, and tyre temperatures for the same corner on the same lap. Identify which driver is accessing more of the car, where the lap time delta is built, and whether the gap is a technique issue or a setup preference divergence in a multi-driver programme.
Teams can manually upload clean lap data to feed directly into the local model instance. Minimum 10 laps, same car, same track, consistent conditions. Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset -effectively learning how that specific chassis behaves at its limit and calibrating every subsequent recommendation against actual history, not generic physics assumptions.
Uploaded data calibrates the local model to that car's specific behaviour. Tyre thermal model, powertrain characteristics, and aero sensitivity are learned from your own clean laps rather than generic sim physics assumptions. Corner-specific tyre window targets and optimal pressure build curves are updated per batch.
Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset. Setup recommendations in session 8 are informed by sessions 1 through 7 not just the current stint. The model learns the car's known balance tendencies, develops track-specific operating windows, and identifies recurring setup patterns across similar venues.
Minimum 10 laps per batch. Same car, same track, consistent conditions. Our engineering team reviews each upload before it is applied to verify data quality and flag anomalies before they affect your calibration baseline. All four major formats supported natively.
The analysis pipeline, setup recommendation logic, and channel weightings have been reviewed and signed off by 30 or more professional motorsport engineers using real championship weekend data. Known divergences between sim physics and real-world behaviour are flagged in output. Circuit-specific weighting adjusts per venue automatically.
Recommendation weightings calibrated against actual race weekend data, not simulation assumptions. Where sim physics diverges from real-world behaviour, those known points are flagged -the model does not treat the sim as the ground truth.
Channel importance hierarchies are circuit-specific. What matters at Bathurst is weighted differently to Spa or Le Mans. The model adjusts corner priority, tyre window targets, and aero sensitivity per venue not a single global weighting applied everywhere.
The debrief format was iterated directly with working engineers until the output matched what they would produce themselves. Format, numerical precision, channel prioritisation, and language were all reviewed and approved before deployment to any team.
The team dashboard is not a data viewer. It is a structured decision-making environment built around how professional engineers actually work through session data -from pit-entry overview through to corner-level mechanical balance diagnosis and endurance strategy modelling. Every panel is purpose-built for actionable engineering decisions, not passive review.
Stint-by-stint lap time progression, tyre thermal history, setup change log, and fuel consumption curve. Designed to be readable at a glance from across a pit garage. Automated anomaly flags for tyre spikes, lock events, and aero instability trigger immediately on detection -no manual review required to find problems.
Per-corner tyre temperature across inner, middle, and outer zones. Stint-length degradation curves. Operating window compliance percentage. Ideal temperature target bands overlaid from compound data. Pressure evolution mapped against track and ambient temperature throughout the full stint.
Every setup change logged against subsequent lap time data. The correlation engine computes which parameter changes delivered measurable improvements and which were neutral or detrimental -building a team-specific setup learning database that compounds in value across sessions and race weekends throughout the season.
Reads suspension travel, tyre slip, G-force, and steering angle simultaneously to diagnose the car's mechanical balance at each circuit section. Outputs a corner-by-corner balance report identifying understeer entry events, trailing throttle oversteer signatures, and aero-mechanical interaction zones that mix mechanical and aero causes.
Built specifically for endurance programmes. Models tyre degradation rate against lap time delta to compute the optimal pit window. Fuel load correction applied to each model iteration. Driver changeover windows with tyre temperature warm-up predictions for each stint opening based on that specific car and compound.
Because the team version runs a full motorsport-grade AI model locally on your hardware, minimum specifications are significantly higher than the consumer version. These are hard minimums. Exceeding them improves processing throughput on large multi-driver sessions.
Every team session is scoped individually. Contact our engineering team to discuss your car, your track programme, and your session requirements before purchase.
The consumer version is for individual drivers and sim racers. If you race on a simulator for fun, training, or personal improvement, this is all you need. One-time setup takes less than 5 minutes for most drivers, daily use takes less than a minute, setup generation takes about 7 seconds, no engineering experience is required, and the free beta gives you everything. The expected release price for the normal ACCELX AI Race Engineer is around $13 USD per month. The consumer driver product is not $1,000 USD. The $1,000 USD price is only for the separate professional Team Sim Session for racing teams.
The free beta is real and fully featured, and we want to keep it that way. Running the AI infrastructure at this level has a cost per session, so the paid beta is an expression of interest for drivers who want access even if the free beta is full. The paid beta is expected to be $7 USD per month during beta, while the expected consumer release price is around $13 USD per month. This is the normal ACCELX AI Race Engineer price for individual sim racers. It is not $1,000 USD. The $1,000 USD price is only for the separate professional Team Sim Session for racing teams. You get the same consumer product either way: one-time under-5-minute setup, less-than-1-minute daily use, 7-second setup generation, and full ACCELX access.
The Team Session is a completely different product built for professional racing teams using simulator data for real-world setup development. It is not an upgrade of the consumer version. Individual drivers and sim racers do not need this and would not benefit from it.
Team sessions are built to order and delivered following engineering review. Contact us to discuss your programme.
A professional motorsport engineering tool used by racing teams for simulator-based setup development and driver evaluation. Not an upgrade of the consumer product. A separate system built to a different specification, validated by working engineers, and deployed on your own hardware.
The consumer version captures telemetry at standard sim output rates. The team version runs at 200Hz across all 134 channels simultaneously. This is not a marginal improvement. It changes what the data can tell you.
A 2-minute lap at 200Hz generates 24,000 samples per channel. A 10-lap stint across 134 channels is approximately 32.2 million data points. A 3-second corner transit at 200km/h is resolved across 600 individual samples. Brake events lasting 0.4 seconds contain 80 discrete capture points. Micro-events such as ABS pulse cycles, tyre slip spikes and suspension oscillation are fully resolved rather than averaged between samples.
A consumer debrief fires in 15 to 30 seconds at pit entry. A team session processing 10 or more laps at 200Hz takes 4 to 8 minutes of compute before the report is ready. This is expected and intentional. The output is a full engineering document, not a chat response. The processing window is used while the team reviews the previous stint and the driver is stationary.
At 200Hz the system captures detail that lower sample rates structurally cannot. Transient events at corner entry, differential lock-up signatures, suspension harmonic oscillation through kerbs and rapid tyre pressure build on the out-lap are all resolved at the sample level. The consumer version operating at 20 to 50Hz sees 8 to 20 samples across the same brake event the team version resolves to 80.
The model does not run on shared cloud infrastructure. It is deployed locally to the team's own hardware or a private hosted instance. No session data, setup data or driver data leaves the team's environment. This is a firm requirement for professional programmes where setup data is commercially sensitive. The local deployment also removes API latency from the processing pipeline, which is part of why the 200Hz throughput is achievable.
The consumer model is trained on sim-racing patterns and AI-inferred engineering logic. The team model analysis pipeline has been reviewed and signed off by 30 or more professional motorsport engineers with real-world championship data behind them.
Setup recommendation weightings calibrated against actual race weekend data, not simulation assumptions. Known divergence points between sim physics and real-world behaviour are flagged in output.
Channel importance hierarchies are circuit-specific. What matters at Bathurst is weighted differently to Spa or Le Mans. The model adjusts corner priority, tyre window targets and aero sensitivity per venue.
The debrief format was iterated with working engineers until the output matched what they would produce themselves. Engineers reviewed the written structure, numerical precision and channel prioritisation order.
The consumer version produces natural language debriefs and conversational setup suggestions. The team version produces numerical engineering documents that a race engineer can act on immediately.
Spring rates in N/mm. ARB stiffness in Nm/deg. Damper curves with slow and fast bump and rebound clicks. Aero rake in millimetres. Front and rear ride height targets. Tyre pressure cold-start targets per compound. Not "try softening the rear ARB." Exact parameter values with direction and magnitude.
Minimum speed values per corner with standard deviation across the session lap set. Outlier laps flagged with cause identified. For example: T5 minimum speed 97.4 plus or minus 1.8 km/h across 10 laps, with lap 6 identified as an outlier due to ABS activation event at 180 metres.
Is the driver converging on the limit or plateauing? Is each setup change producing the expected response? Are gains compounding or diminishing? The system tracks session-over-session performance direction and flags when a setup change is not producing the expected response across the telemetry.
Adding rear wing by 2 degrees gains time in Sector 2 but costs on the straight. The matrix shows the net lap time impact so the engineer decides with data not instinct. Differential, suspension, aero and tyre compound trade-offs are all modelled and presented as structured tables, not prose.
Teams can manually upload clean lap data to feed directly into the local model instance. Minimum 10 laps, same car, same track, consistent conditions. Each batch improves the model's baseline for that specific vehicle.
Uploaded data calibrates the local model instance to that car's specific behaviour. Tyre thermal model, powertrain characteristics and aero sensitivity are learned from your own clean laps rather than generic sim physics assumptions.
Over multiple uploads across a season, the model builds a car-specific dataset. Setup recommendations in session 8 are informed by sessions 1 through 7 not just the current stint. The model learns the car's known balance tendencies.
CSV telemetry export. MoTeC i2 export. Bosch DDU export. Raw ACCELX session files. Uploaded data is isolated to the team's private instance and is never used in the consumer model or shared with any other team.
Because the team version runs a full motorsport-grade AI model locally on your hardware, minimum specifications are significantly higher than for the consumer version. These are hard minimums. Meeting them exactly will work. Exceeding them will improve processing throughput on large sessions.
The team dashboard is not a data viewer. It is a decision-making environment built around how professional engineers actually work through session data. Every panel is purpose-built for actionable engineering decisions, not passive review.
Top-level session summary showing stint-by-stint lap time progression, tyre thermal history, setup change log, and fuel consumption curve. Designed to be readable at a glance from across a pit garage.
Load up to four drivers simultaneously across any channel. Overlay throttle traces, brake points, steering angle, and tyre temperatures for the same corner on the same lap. Identify which driver is accessing more of the car and where.
Per-corner tyre temperature across inner, middle, and outer zones. Stint-length degradation curves. Operating window compliance percentage. Ideal temperature target bands overlaid from the vehicle's compound data. Pressure evolution mapped against track temperature.
Every setup change entered into the system is logged against subsequent lap time data. The correlation engine computes which parameter changes delivered measurable improvements and which were neutral or detrimental -building a team-specific setup learning database across sessions.
Reads suspension travel, tyre slip, G-force, and steering angle simultaneously to diagnose the car's mechanical balance at each circuit section. Outputs a corner-by-corner balance report identifying understeer entry events, trailing throttle oversteer signatures, and aero-mechanical interaction zones.
Built specifically for endurance programmes. Models tyre deg rate against lap time delta to compute the optimal pit window. Fuel load correction applied to each model iteration. Driver changeover windows with tyre temp warm-up predictions for each stint opening.
The consumer version captures 45 core channels -inputs, tyre state, dynamics, and environment. The team version expands to 134 channels, adding the extended mechanical, aerodynamic, vehicle dynamics, and multi-system interaction channels that professional engineers need for detailed setup work.
What professional engineers, club-level drivers, and track day enthusiasts say about the ACCELX platform.
"We ran it alongside our MoTeC system for three sessions to validate the outputs. It agreed with us on everything that mattered and flagged a rear brake bias issue we'd been attributing to driver error. It wasn't."
"The debrief format is exactly what I'd produce myself for a driver review. I've reviewed a lot of AI outputs that need translating for the garage. This one doesn't. It's already in the right language."
"For track days it's genuinely transformative. I'm not a professional but I understand what's happening to my car after every session now. Before this I was just guessing."
"Club-level endurance racer. The tyre deg analysis is the one thing I never had access to before. Understanding when to push and when to protect the tyres has completely changed how I manage a stint."
"The 200Hz data resolution resolved a transient that showed up as a brief instability at the apex of T7. At standard sample rates it would have been invisible. Found and fixed in one session."
"I use real MoTeC data from my actual car and this is what I compare the AI's output against. It's not quite at that level -nothing is -but it's the closest I've seen from an AI system and for sim work it's more than enough."
"Track day instructor. I use it with my students to show them what they're actually doing. The track map coloured by brake pressure is the clearest teaching tool I've found. Visual. Immediate. Correct."
"Our team engineer validated the setup recommendation logic against three race weekends of real data. The correlation was strong. We're now using it as a pre-session planning tool before we even fire the car."
"We ran it alongside our MoTeC system for three sessions to validate the outputs. It agreed with us on everything that mattered and flagged a rear brake bias issue we'd been attributing to driver error. It wasn't."
"The debrief format is exactly what I'd produce myself for a driver review. I've reviewed a lot of AI outputs that need translating for the garage. This one doesn't. It's already in the right language."
"For track days it's genuinely transformative. I'm not a professional but I understand what's happening to my car after every session now. Before this I was just guessing."
"Club-level endurance racer. The tyre deg analysis is the one thing I never had access to before. Understanding when to push and when to protect the tyres has completely changed how I manage a stint."
"The 200Hz data resolution resolved a transient that showed up as a brief instability at the apex of T7. At standard sample rates it would have been invisible. Found and fixed in one session."
"I use real MoTeC data from my actual car and this is what I compare the AI's output against. It's not quite at that level -nothing is -but it's the closest I've seen from an AI system and for sim work it's more than enough."
"I came in sceptical. The output on my first session was a four-page engineering debrief that would have taken me an hour to produce manually. It took the AI about 6 minutes. I'm not sceptical anymore."
"Track day community doesn't usually have access to this level of analysis. The fact that it fires automatically at pit entry means you actually use it. No faff. No exports. Just drive, pit, read."
"The multi-driver comparison found 0.4 seconds of lap time in the data that nobody could explain. It was corner exit traction -one driver feathering the throttle, one applying it progressively. Night and day trace difference."
"For club-level racing this is genuinely beyond what I thought was available. My engineer in real life does similar work but I can't afford him for sim sessions. Now I don't need to."
"The setup correlation tool is the most useful thing in the team dashboard. We've been running for three months and it's built a database of what works at each track. That's a product you can't buy elsewhere."
"I do weekend track days and this changed what I'm able to learn per session. Instead of vague impressions I have corner-level data telling me exactly what changed between run 1 and run 4."
"We validated the aero analysis against CFD outputs from our actual car programme. The relative ordering of setup changes matched. For simulator work the delta accuracy is excellent."
"The tyre stint modelling for endurance predicted our tyre cliff within 2 laps over a 28-lap stint. We changed our pit strategy based on it. It was correct. We gained track position."
"I came in sceptical. The output on my first session was a four-page engineering debrief that would have taken me an hour to produce manually. It took the AI about 6 minutes. I'm not sceptical anymore."
"Track day community doesn't usually have access to this level of analysis. The fact that it fires automatically at pit entry means you actually use it. No faff. No exports. Just drive, pit, read."
"The multi-driver comparison found 0.4 seconds of lap time in the data that nobody could explain. It was corner exit traction -one driver feathering the throttle, one applying it progressively. Night and day trace difference."
"For club-level racing this is genuinely beyond what I thought was available. My engineer in real life does similar work but I can't afford him for sim sessions. Now I don't need to."
We do the team version on order. Each session is engineered to your car, your track and your programme. Contact us to start the conversation.
All team session applications go through an engineering review before access is granted. This is not a bureaucratic process -it exists so that every team session we deliver is scoped correctly and the output is actually useful for your programme. Read this before applying.
Contact us with your car, track programme, and session objectives. We need to understand what you are trying to achieve before we scope the session correctly. Applications are reviewed in the order received on a rolling basis.
Applications take up to 7 days to process. Our engineering team reviews every application against the current session schedule and available deployment capacity. We may reach out during this period with clarifying questions about your programme.
If your application is approved we will reach out with an invoice and next steps for your session. For paid applications, access is guaranteed to be granted within 24 hours of payment confirmation. For standard applications, access timing is confirmed at this stage.
Before your session begins, our engineering team conducts a technical onboarding to configure the local deployment, verify your hardware meets specification, and align on session objectives and output format. This is typically a 30-minute process.
To process your application efficiently, include the following information in your initial contact. Incomplete applications take longer to review and may require a follow-up before we can proceed.
Once your application is submitted, here is what to expect from us. We aim to respond to all applications within 7 days. If you have not heard back within 10 business days, please follow up directly.
All team sessions are covered by a mutual non-disclosure agreement. We take setup data and programme data seriously. The NDA is a standard engineering programme agreement -it is simple, mutual, and is signed before any session data or programme details are shared in either direction. We do not use complex legal language or impose unusual terms. It is a straightforward confidentiality agreement.
The NDA is mutual -it applies to both parties. We do not share your session data, setup data, driver performance data, or programme details with any third party. You do not share our proprietary engineering methodology, model architecture, or output formats publicly. These are the two core obligations.
The NDA is sent as part of the onboarding package once your application is approved. It is a one-page document in plain language. We do not use it as a barrier -we use it as a commitment to both parties that the programme is treated professionally. Signing is typically completed within 24 hours of receipt.
All team session participants are required to provide structured feedback every two weeks during an active programme. This is not optional -it is a condition of access. The team version is in active development and the engineering quality of the output directly depends on real programme feedback from teams using the system under actual session conditions.
The team version is not a finished commercial product. It is an active engineering development programme. The output quality compounds over time as the team's local model is calibrated and as the team's feedback informs engineering decisions on the core pipeline. Teams that provide consistent, detailed feedback get a better-calibrated product over time. Teams that do not provide feedback may have their access reviewed.
For paid applications, once your invoice is settled, access is guaranteed to be granted within 24 hours of payment confirmation. We commit to this as a firm service timeline. If access is not granted within 24 hours of payment, contact us immediately and we will resolve it. Standard (unpaid) applications have access timing confirmed at the approval stage -this varies based on session scheduling and current deployment capacity.
Team sessions are priced at $1,000 per session, built to order. This is not the normal ACCELX price for individual sim racers. The normal consumer ACCELX AI Race Engineer is expected to release at around $13 USD per month. The $1,000 price applies only to the professional Team Sim Session, covering local deployment, engineering review, onboarding, output delivery, and post-session calibration. There is no subscription model for the team product. Each session is a discrete engineering engagement. Ongoing multi-session programmes are available and are scoped separately with our engineering team.
Australia's leading simulator consultancy - from budget-conscious first builds to professional race driver programmes. We match every driver to the right hardware, every time.

A budget-matched shopping list with a detailed spreadsheet, local pricing, a full cost breakdown, and links to the lowest available prices.

Tier 1 plus a focused 15-60 minute voice or video call to compare gear options, simulator designs, and the reasoning behind the chosen build.

Tier 2 plus a full build plan with multiple simulator options, room layout, rig layout, cable planning, and personal field-of-view calculations.

Simulator matched to a real race car profile - wheel design, pedal travel, seat position, custom gear exploration, and software setup support.
60+ drivers and teams have worked with our consultancy. Here's what they had to say.
"The build list was incredibly detailed -every part cross-referenced against Australian suppliers with links and pricing. Saved me weeks of research and probably a few hundred dollars."
"Honestly did not expect this level of detail for $40. The spreadsheet broke down every component, gave me alternatives at different price points, and explained the trade-offs. Proper engineering work."
"Good turnaround and solid advice on the sim profile matching my GT3 car. A couple of things I'd have done slightly differently but the pedal travel and wheel weight recommendations were spot on."
"The video call in Tier 2 was worth every cent. We went through three rig options and I actually understood why one was better suited to my room and driving style. Great consult."
"Had the Tier 3 build plan done -the room layout diagram alone was something I hadn't even thought about. Cable routing, monitor positioning, FOV numbers. Comprehensive is an understatement."
"Fast. Thorough. Matching seat position to my real car was a level of detail I didn't expect from an online consult. The Pro Driver Program is worth it if you're serious about your training."
"Really useful getting an outside perspective on the hardware. I was convinced I needed a motion platform -the consult helped me realise the money was better spent on load cell pedals first."
"Went from completely lost to confident in a few days. The Tier 1 list was better than anything I'd found on forums after two weeks of searching. Clear communication throughout."
"Got the Tier 2 done before committing to a 3k rig. The call changed about 40% of what I was going to buy. Saved more than ten times the consult fee on parts I'd have returned."
"Didn't realise how much the FOV calculation would change my driving feel until I set it up correctly. That one change was a revelation. Tier 3 completely justified."
"Solid advice, well structured document. Asked for a slight revision on the monitor setup and it was turned around the same day. Responsive and professional throughout."
"Been racing for years and still got useful recommendations. The Pro program matched my Tasman FJ specifics to load cell calibration in a way I hadn't seen done before."
"The build list was incredibly detailed -every part cross-referenced against Australian suppliers with links and pricing. Saved me weeks of research and probably a few hundred dollars."
"Honestly did not expect this level of detail for $40. The spreadsheet broke down every component, gave me alternatives at different price points, and explained the trade-offs. Proper engineering work."
"Good turnaround and solid advice on the sim profile matching my GT3 car. A couple of things I'd have done slightly differently but the pedal travel and wheel weight recommendations were spot on."
"The video call in Tier 2 was worth every cent. We went through three rig options and I actually understood why one was better suited to my room and driving style. Great consult."
"Had the Tier 3 build plan done -the room layout diagram alone was something I hadn't even thought about. Cable routing, monitor positioning, FOV numbers. Comprehensive is an understatement."
"Fast. Thorough. Matching seat position to my real car was a level of detail I didn't expect from an online consult. The Pro Driver Program is worth it if you're serious about your training."
"Really useful getting an outside perspective on the hardware. I was convinced I needed a motion platform -the consult helped me realise the money was better spent on load cell pedals first."
"Went from completely lost to confident in a few days. The Tier 1 list was better than anything I'd found on forums after two weeks of searching. Clear communication throughout."
"Got the Tier 2 done before committing to a 3k rig. The call changed about 40% of what I was going to buy. Saved more than ten times the consult fee on parts I'd have returned."
"Didn't realise how much the FOV calculation would change my driving feel until I set it up correctly. That one change was a revelation. Tier 3 completely justified."
"Solid advice, well structured document. Asked for a slight revision on the monitor setup and it was turned around the same day. Responsive and professional throughout."
"Been racing for years and still got useful recommendations. The Pro program matched my Tasman FJ specifics to load cell calibration in a way I hadn't seen done before."
"Honestly surprised at how personalised it felt for a remote consult. Mentioned the size of my space and the gear was perfectly sized for it. Nothing over-specified, nothing missing."
"The Tier 2 call was a proper technical conversation, not a sales pitch. We went through load cell vs potentiometer pedals in real depth. Came away genuinely informed."
"Good value and useful detail. The pricing was accurate for Australia which is harder to find than you'd think. Would have liked slightly more on the software side but hardware coverage was thorough."
"Used ACCELX consultancy before building my second rig. First one was built on forum advice and was a mess. This time everything was right first go. Night and day."
"I asked a lot of questions and every single one got a detailed answer. Feels like you're talking to someone who actually uses this gear, not just selling it."
"Came in with a very specific brief -single screen, minimal footprint, GT-feel pedals and got exactly that back, costed out with part numbers. Fast and useful."
"I needed something that would genuinely prepare me for my Ginetta. The Pro program built a complete profile -I could feel the difference in braking feel almost immediately."
"Not just a list of hardware -the reasoning behind each choice was explained clearly. I knew exactly why each part was recommended and what it would change about my sim feel."
"Honestly surprised at how personalised it felt for a remote consult. Mentioned the size of my space and the gear was perfectly sized for it. Nothing over-specified, nothing missing."
"The Tier 2 call was a proper technical conversation, not a sales pitch. We went through load cell vs potentiometer pedals in real depth. Came away genuinely informed."
"Good value and useful detail. The pricing was accurate for Australia which is harder to find than you'd think. Would have liked slightly more on the software side but hardware coverage was thorough."
"Used ACCELX consultancy before building my second rig. First one was built on forum advice and was a mess. This time everything was right first go. Night and day."
"I asked a lot of questions and every single one got a detailed answer. Feels like you're talking to someone who actually uses this gear, not just selling it."
"Came in with a very specific brief -single screen, minimal footprint, GT-feel pedals and got exactly that back, costed out with part numbers. Fast and useful."
"I needed something that would genuinely prepare me for my Ginetta. The Pro program built a complete profile -I could feel the difference in braking feel almost immediately."
"Not just a list of hardware -the reasoning behind each choice was explained clearly. I knew exactly why each part was recommended and what it would change about my sim feel."
A clean, budget-led parts selection for drivers who want to build with confidence. We turn your budget into a realistic shopping list, then give you the pricing, links, and cost breakdown to move quickly.

Tier 2 adds a direct strategy call to your shopping list. We compare realistic gear options, talk through simulator designs, and explain why each recommendation fits your budget, driving goals, and space.

Tier 3 moves from buying advice into build planning. You receive multiple simulator options, a layout for your room and rig, cable planning, and screen/FOV guidance so the final setup feels intentional.

A deeper simulator programme for drivers who want their sim to mirror a chosen car as closely as practical. We work through cockpit position, control feel, custom gear options, and software matching with an allocated engineer.

For general enquiries, team session bookings, beta questions, or partnership discussions -we respond within 24 hours.
We'll get back to you within 24 hours.
Your beta application has been sent to the ACCELX team. We review every application and will be in touch within 24 hours.
In the meantime -go find some more time to lose.
Hey- Just to be upfront! Filling this out doesn't lock you into anything and we're not taking any payment right now. We're just curious whether a guranteed placement in a paid beta is something people might be interested in. This does not reduce any existing spots in our Free beta, just allows who didn't get in to effeiclty pay for what they use
If you do register within 24 hours a video demo showcaing operations and howeverything operate will be sent directly to your email and/or phone number.
The free beta is the real deal and has everything. This would simply let more drivers in without us having to ration spots - same product, just more people getting access. If the interest is there, we'll reach out with next steps.
We'll review your application and be in touch within 24 hours with payment and access details.